Facts About valid marriage pakistani case law Revealed

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the legislation laid down via the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority with the parent department of your petitioner and also the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount on the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which he is entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of your respondent is usually directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it ideal for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

The website presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows for any more extensive legal response.

Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there could possibly be a person or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason to the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all could be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted within an argument.

In almost any society, the enforcement of legislation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of several most serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is critical to guarantee justice prevails.

Online access to your case management system with the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.

When the petitioner is solely present in the place of event without causing any injury for the deceased or PWs then in these circumstances, whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided by the learned trial Court after recording in the evidence.

The scrupulous reader might have noticed some thing over: a flaw. Past the first seven words, the definition focuses around the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 primary elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “

This article delves into the intricacies with the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to offer an extensive understanding of its implications and sensible applications.

The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness from the regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary on the determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]